Interview Rubric

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We're Solving Society

  What Our Project is Going to Require   WE’RE SOLVING SOCIETY I am one woman committed to solving social problems, hoping to put a few names after mine for this organization.  How it works Specify what problems have hit you directly. Answer all required questions. Wait for triage, and think about what you would like to contribute. Spread the word so we can get funding going.  Get an interview.  Consent or do not to having your interview published.  Contribute or do not to a proposed solution. Consider donating your skills or sign up for the compensated waitlist once our Transparent Budget is online and able to be properly distributed.  Decide if you want to be an acknowledged or anonymous contributer.  WSS believes that we are currently undergoing a crisis due to national inaction. We have decided to take these issues into our hands. Currently WSS is a volunteer freelance organization with very limited funding, but we will be allocating funds to ...
Read more

Projected Payment Table

Currently, we can only budget for our $10 interviews. As funding rolls in, we will be compensating for articles, and hopefully raising the compensation to $30 for each written piece. Conducting an interview that receive a score of 7/10 or more on our interview review board : Will result in $10 Writing a proposed solution that receives a score of 7/10 or more on our preconceived rubric available here: Will result in $20 Donating services: free on your incentive. $10 appreciations will be coming in as budget allows. We will have to be over a certain budget threshold to instantiate financial appreciations. We would like to pay for JSTOR research as soon as our budget allows.
Read more

Performative Nonchalance and Apathy: A Reflection on Addiction, Ethos, and Power Struggles in Honor of Earth Day

  I recently  just read an article  from WRCBtv.com where a police officer, Sergeant Ker Yang states (in regards to Chauvin) that police officers were “trained to appear confident, stay calm and avoid staring or eye contact.” Simultaneously, we see the statement “he appears altogether unconcerned with the desperation and agony just below him” and that “this wasn’t the face of fear or concern or worry.” Yet, obviously, he had complete cau s e to worry — he repressed it. He lost his job, he made a horrifying mistake. It doesn’t matter how excellent his performance of nonchalance was, he indeed had every right to be terrified and luckily for us, some semblance of justice was served. Why, do you think, might this be? As part of deescalation tactics, many officers are trained to downplay the weight of the situation or pretend to be unworried or nonchalant. For instance, when things are going really poorly for a top official, this might be the exact moment where he may laugh, d...
Read more